Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation
Uses and Abuses
History and Foundations of Information Science
- Format: Innbundet
- Antall sider: 136
- Språk: Engelsk
- Forlag/Utgiver: SD Books
- Serienavn: History and Foundations of Information Science
- EAN: 9780262035125
- Utgivelsesår: 2016
- Bidragsyter: Gingras, Yves (Universite du Quebec a Montreal)
399,-
Why bibliometrics is useful for understanding the global dynamics of science but generate perverse effects when applied inappropriately in research evaluation and university rankings.
The research evaluation market is booming. “Ranking,” “metrics,” “h-index,” and “impact factors” are reigning buzzwords. Government and research administrators want to evaluate everything—teachers, professors, training programs, universities—using quantitative indicators. Among the tools used to measure “research excellence,” bibliometrics—aggregate data on publications and citations—has become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an “objective” measure of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than “subjective” and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review that have been used since scientific papers were first published in the seventeenth century. In this book,